As military tensions escalate between Israel and Iran, cryptocurrency and blockchain are becoming entangled in conflicts not just financially, but digitally.
The recent $81 million hack of the Iranian cryptocurrency exchange Nobitex was a turning point, with experts warning that blockchain has officially become a geopolitical battlefield.
Blockchain: A New Frontier in the Israel-Iran Conflict
Merkle Science acknowledged that the Gonjeshke Darande group carried out this attack, which aligns with a recent hacker group report by BeInCrypto.
However, according to Merkle Science, a blockchain analysis and predictive risk platform, the attack was carried out by a pro-Israel hacker group, carrying a message that blockchain is now the geopolitical frontline.
"This was not just a theft. It was a message. Blockchain is now the geopolitical frontline," the company announced.
This statement came after their forensic tracker revealed the stolen funds moving through multiple addresses, suggesting the attack was more than a mere cybercrime and had political motivations.

Indeed, BeInCrypto reported the Gonjeshke Darande group's motivation as attempting to restrain Iran as part of Israel's war against Iran-supported terrorism.
The group is widely believed to be associated with Israeli military intelligence, though Israel maintains an ambiguous stance on their involvement.
"The Nobitex exchange is at the center of the regime's efforts to fund terrorism worldwide and is its preferred tool for sanction violations... Nobitex doesn't even pretend to comply with sanctions. It publicly instructs users on how to circumvent sanctions. Working at Nobitex is considered valid military service because it is essential to the regime's efforts," the hacker group said on Wednesday.
The attack on Nobitex demonstrates a tendency to weaponize cryptocurrency infrastructure in state-level and asymmetric conflicts.
Attacks like the Nobitex hack highlight a growing trend where crypto infrastructure is increasingly being weaponized in geopolitical cyber campaigns.
— PolySwarm 🇺🇸 (@PolySwarm) June 18, 2025
As these conflicts evolve, so does the risk to the systems we all rely on.#Crypto #CyberSecurity #ThreatIntel #PolySwarm $NCT
These changes have significant implications. Investors now face assets exposed to market volatility and increasingly targeted geopolitical attacks.
When countries hosting major cryptocurrency exchanges become embroiled in conflicts, platforms can become marked targets.
"Without leadership in blockchain and cryptocurrency, nations are exposed to economic chaos, regulatory gaps, and security vulnerabilities, which are risks ready to be exploited by hostile nations," Merkle Science warned in a report.
Strategic Shifts in Blockchain Leadership
The report also points out that blockchain decentralization is not absolute, meaning nations can exploit infrastructure through traffic filtering or validator capture, potentially converting strategic assets into liabilities.
Indeed, blockchain's strategic role is already evident in U.S. defense plans. The Navy's use of SIMBA Chain to track F/A-18 aircraft parts demonstrates the technology's practical utility in protecting critical systems.
Simultaneously, anonymity and speed have made cryptocurrency a powerful tool for malicious actors. From money laundering to sanction evasion, cryptocurrency has long been favored by rogue nations and terrorist groups.
In 2024 alone, cryptocurrency-related hacks and attacks resulted in $1.49 billion in losses, more than double the previous year. Groups like North Korea's Lazarus have funded operations by exploiting cryptocurrency platform vulnerabilities, including the $1.5 billion Bybit heist.
The Nobitex hack adds urgency to the role of digital assets in modern warfare, highlighting how state-linked hackers and insurgent groups increasingly use cryptocurrency as a messaging tool as sanctions tighten and traditional financial access becomes difficult.
For Gonjeshke Darande, this is retaliation against Iran's regional aggression and its proxies, such as Hezbollah and the Houthis, while attempting to minimize civilian casualties.